The Problems and Possibilities of Defining Precise Criteria to Distinguish
Between Ethical and Unethical Proselytizing/Evangelism[1]
Elmer J. Thiessen, Ph.D.
Abstract
This paper explores some of the
problems that I have encountered in trying to define precise general criteria to
distinguish between ethical and unethical proselytizing or evangelism. Another
objective is to explore ways to overcome these problems. I examine the notion
of a “continuum” of persuasion or proselytizing techniques as a way of
overcoming, at least partially, the problem of vagueness. A continuum of
persuasion, ranging from obviously noncoercive to obviously coercive, does at
least help us to define clear examples of ethical and unethical proselytizing at
either end of the continuum. I then suggest that examples that fall in between
these extremes are best treated in terms of a case by case analysis. Finally, I
suggest a multi-level approach to ethical thinking, which allows for different
levels of precision in criteria to distinguish between ethical and unethical
proselytizing.
Full text available through
ICSA E-Library.
|
