This article was published in Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 1,
No. 1, 2002, pp. 3-50. American Family Foundation was renamed
International Cultic Studies Association in 2004.
History of the American Family Foundation
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
The American Family Foundation (AFF) was founded in
Massachusetts in 1979 by Mr. Kay Barney, an engineer and business executive
whose daughter had become involved with the Unification Church.
During the late 1970s several dozen parents’ groups had formed around
the U.S.
Other countries also had
parents’ groups, although there was little international communication at
that time.
Many of the U.S.
organizations became affiliates of the Citizens Freedom Foundation (CFF),
which was chartered around the same time as AFF.
In the early 1980s CFF became the Cult Awareness Network
(CAN), which was ultimately taken over by individuals associated with the
Church of Scientology in 1996, when CAN was driven into bankruptcy because of
litigation.
CAN had been the
object of nearly 50 lawsuits, most filed by individuals associated with the
Church of Scientology.
These organizations came into existence when parents of
usually college-age cult members discovered their mutual concern and decided
to take concerted action.
Some of
these parents lobbied for legislation that would make it easier for parents of
cult members to force their adult children to submit to psychiatric
observation (“conservatorship” legislation); others focused on public and
preventive education by speaking to schools, churches, synagogues, and civic
groups and by telling their stories to journalists.
Many also became proponents of “deprogramming,” a process in which
an adult child would be “snatched” from the street, for example, or lured
to a secure place away from the group’s pressures so that he/she could be
forced to listen to people tell about the negative side of his/her group.
Because so many parents had seen similarities between their
children’s behavior and brainwashed prisoners of war in Korea, cult members
came to be viewed as brainwashed, or “programmed.”
Hence, they coined the term “deprogramming” to describe the process
of bringing somebody out of a cult.
Although
initially “deprogramming” referred to involuntary and voluntary
interventions, by the late 1990s most people used the term to describe
involuntary interventions only, using “exit counseling” to describe
interventions that the group member voluntarily agreed to participate in.
In the late 1970s there were also dozens of Evangelical
ministries concerned about cults, mainly the Mormons and the Jehovah’s
Witnesses.
Some of these
organizations had more than a dozen staff members (e.g., Christian Research
Institute), but most were “mom-and-pop,” volunteer organizations.
They tended to define “cult” in theological terms, so
that any group that was deviant from orthodox Christianity was considered a
cult.
Many of the mainstream
organizations rested on the pioneering work of Evangelical scholar, Dr. Walter
Martin, author of
The Kingdom of the
Cults.
Initially there was little communication between the
Evangelical ministries and the secular parents’ groups.
Over the years, however, communication between the two groups increased
dramatically.
A number of people
now serve on boards of both secular and religious cult educational
organizations.
During the 1970s interest in cults increased
substantially among sociologists of religion.
These sociologists, however, tended to oppose deprogramming and
conservatorship legislation.
They
also appeared to focus on the positive aspects of cults and to downplay the
negative.
As a result, parents’
groups did not see them as resources.
Because
media reports concerning cults focused on the negative, especially after the
Jonestown horror of 1978, sociologists came to prefer the term “new
religious movements” over “cult,” which they had used prior to the
1980s.
Finding little solace among sociologists of religion,
parents turned instead to a handful of mental health professionals who seemed
to be sympathetic to the notion that formerly traditional young people were
indeed changing radically as a result of a group’s persuasiveness.
Most mental health professionals at the time tended to dismiss cult
joining as a transient adolescent rebellion or as an expression of deep-seated
emotional or family conflicts.
But
some mental health professionals, most notably Dr. Margaret Singer in
California and Dr. John Clark in Massachusetts, believed that cult
environments were characterized by socio-psychological forces powerful enough
to radically change the behavior and attitudes of recruits.
How AFF was Different
Mr. Barney believed in the cause that united the diverse
people involved in secular and religious cult education organizations, namely,
the necessity to warn people about and free people from the destructive
controls wielded by certain new groups that were mostly, but not always,
religious.
He also believed,
however, that it was necessary to take a professional perspective, that is, to
study the field scientifically and to apply these findings in a balanced,
responsible manner.
He also
wanted to avoid the internal political debates that took so much time from the
parents’ groups, which were moving toward a national membership
organization.
Therefore, he founded AFF as a nonprofit, tax-exempt
research and educational organization that did NOT have a membership base.
The founding board of directors appointed its successors, thereby
ensuring a relatively smooth succession.
The founding directors included Mr. Barney, Rev. Dr. George Swope, a
minister, Ed Schnee, a concerned parent, and David Adler, a publishing
executive and former group member.
Initially, AFF focused on publishing The Advisor, a bi-monthly newspaper that reported on cult-related
news.
In 1980-81 he expanded
AFF’s activities by formally joining forces with Dr. John Clark and his
colleagues, who included Dr. Michael Langone, current executive director of
AFF, and Dr. Robert E. Schecter, editor of the Cult
Observer.
Dr. Clark, an
Assistant Clinical Professor at Harvard Medical School and Consulting
Psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), was one of the first
prominent mental health professionals to speak out publicly about cult abuses.
He had published a paper, “Cults,” in the Journal
of the American Medical Association in 1979.
Dr. Clark’s team, which had been meeting informally,
brought to AFF the professionalism that Mr. Barney and the founding directors
thought was needed.
Early Years of AFF
In 1981 Dr. Clark’s team obtained several grants from
foundations.
These grants enabled
them to write a monograph, Destructive
Cult Conversion: Theory, Research, and Treatment, in which they proposed a
person-situation model of cult conversion.
This model, based more on the psychology of social influence than
so-called “brainwashing” models, laid the groundwork for AFF’s future
theoretical developments.
The grants also enabled them to set up systems for
responding to the mounting number of information requests from families,
former group members, helping professionals, and the media.
By 1985 AFF was responding to several thousand information
requests (mostly from families and former members) and providing background
information to dozens and sometimes more than 100 journalists annually.
AFF’s capacity to respond effectively to inquiries has improved over
the years as we have learned more and produced practical books, articles, and
other resources.
Today, most of our communications occur thorugh e-mail,
although the effectiveness of telephone consultations should not be
underestimated.
Appendix A
provides additional information on AFF’s Information Service.
Dr. Clark also set out early on to establish an advisory
board of professionals and scholars.
The
first advisory board meeting, attended by several dozen people, was held in
1981.
(An advisory board meeting
has been held every year since 1981.)
Advisors
included, and continue to include, mental health professionals, attorneys,
academicians, clergy, educators, executives, and former members and family
members active in cult education.
Advisors
help establish goals and objectives for the organization, advise staff on
research and publications, write articles and books, and speak to professional
and lay groups.
Since the first
advisory board meeting, AFF advisors have written among the most prominent
books in this field, many of which are available through AFF’s bookstore.
Appendix B includes a partial list of articles and books published by
AFF and its advisors.
The first advisory board meeting in 1981 identified
AFF’s three-tiered mission of research, education, and victim assistance.
Budget limitations have necessitated that the organization develop
these areas in a cyclic manner:
sometimes
the development focus has been on research; other times on education or victim
assistance.
But attention has
been paid to all three areas throughout AFF’s history.
AFF’s first research survey, conducted in 1983, had a
practical focus, as has most of the research conducted since then.
This survey collected quantifiable data on one of the questions that
most troubled parents and mental health professionals at that time, many of
whom had serious reservations about the deprogramming that was often depicted
as the way to get people out of
cults:
How often does
deprogramming work?
To answer
this question, AFF’s Dr. Michael Langone surveyed 94 parents who had had
their children deprogrammed.
Deprogramming
failed in 37% of the cases, a significant percentage given the legal and
psychological risks of the procedure.
The
study concluded that “deprogramming is but one of several helping options
and should not be viewed as the `cure’ for cult involvement.”
In 1983 Drs. Clark and Langone contributed to a symposium
sponsored by Section K (Social, Economic and Political Sciences) of the
Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science,
entitled, “Scientific Research and New Religions.”
Their paper’s title was: “New Religions and Public Policy: Research
Implications for Social and Behavioral Scientists.”
This symposium was one of the few gatherings that brought
together academicians and professionals from what was already viewed as the
two “camps” of “pro” and “anti” cultists.
Communication between these two “camps” decreased markedly in the
1980s as members of both “camps” were hired as expert witnesses in the
growing number of lawsuits against and by cultic groups.
In the late 1990s, however, AFF reopened dialogue between the two
“camps,” trying as much as possible to encourage openness to
methodological differences among disciplines and to diverse theoretical
orientations, while remaining focused on the irrefutable fact under girding
AFF’s mission:
some groups harm
some people sometimes.
In 1984 AFF markedly advanced the quality of its
publishing efforts by founding the Cult
Observer and Cultic Studies Journal
(CSJ).
The former succeeded The Advisor and focused on press accounts.
It
was printed, however, as a newsletter, rather than a tabloid newspaper.
The latter filled the need for a multi-disciplined, peer-reviewed
journal that was open to critical perspectives on cult issues.
CSJ’s editorial board included helping professionals,
academicians, attorneys, educators, clergy, and business executives.
Over the years CSJ has published more than 160 articles and several
hundred book reviews.
Many of
these articles provide practical help for families, ex-members, and helping
professionals, while others report on scientific research, legal issues,
theoretical speculations, and other subjects.
Several issues were special collections, including Women
Under the Influence (edited by Dr. Janja Lalich), published in 1997.
One of its early issues (Volume 2, Number 2 – 1985)
illustrated well AFF’s continuing mission of bringing together diverse
parties interested in cultic abuses.
This
special issue was entitled, “Cults, Evangelicals, and the Ethics of Social
Influence.”
The issue arose
from conversations AFF staff had had with the staff of InterVarsity Christian
Fellowship, one of the leading Evangelical campus ministries.
InterVarsity strongly supports freedom of religion and the Christian
obligation to preach the Gospel.
But
InterVarsity recognized that sometimes its lay evangelists, who were often
young and inexperienced, lost their ethical bearings and became manipulative
or abusive.
The InterVarsity
staff appreciated Dr. Clark’s statement that in cults we witness an
“impermissible experiment” on the changing of human personality, an
experiment that is “impermissible” because cults violate the unwritten
ethical codes of human social influence.
InterVarsity’s vital contribution to this special issue was to
organize a team of evangelical scholars to come up with an ethical code for
the Christian evangelist.
Rev.
Dr. Robert Watts Thornburg, Dean of Boston University’s Marsh Chapel, later
revised this ethical code with his staff and used it to determine when
criticism of campus religious groups was warranted, as well as to keep their
own house in order.
Other
universities also expressed an interest in the ethical code.
This special CSJ issue also underlined one of AFF’s
enduring themes, namely, the concern about cults rests not on their creeds but
on their deeds, on the unethical ways in which they seek to recruit, retain,
and exploit members.
Wingspread Conference
This theme was emphasized in a landmark conference that
AFF organized in 1985 in conjunction with the Neuropsychiatric Institute of
the University of California at Los Angeles and the Johnson Foundation, which
hosted the conference at its Wingspread campus in Racine, Wisconsin.
This conference brought together 40 individuals, including
representatives from England and Germany.
Among the participants were mental health professionals, clergy,
academicians, journalists, the president of the National PTA, attorneys,
campus administrators, and the Head of the Private Office of Richard Cottrell,
Member of the European Parliament from Bath, England.
The goals of the conference and its recommendations continue to guide
AFF to this day.
The goals were to:
-
examine our level of knowledge about cultic groups and their effects on
individuals, families, and society;
-
identify areas in which scientific studies of cults have been
inadequate; and
-
consider ways in which social policy regarding cults might, without
violating fundamental civil liberties, be changed for the greater protection
of the public.
This Wingspread conference made 21 recommendations
classified under research, education, and law.
The full text of the report was published in Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1986.
Resources for Families
Recognizing that families needed practical, hands-on
books to help them deal with loved ones in cultic groups AFF began in the
mid-1980s to begin work on the first of a series of books aimed at families.
Cults: What Parents
Should Know, published in 1988 was written by former group member and
counselor, Joan Carol Ross, and Dr. Michael Langone.
This book addressed issues of assessment, defining the
problem, communication, planning, and dealing with post-cult difficulties.
In 1992 AFF published the first edition of Carol
Giambalvo’s Exit Counseling: A Family
Intervention.
This book
complemented Cults: What Parents Should Know by providing practical details and
advice for families considering an exit counseling.
Its publication was a landmark event in the supplanting of
deprogramming by noncoercive exit counseling approaches.
A revised, second edition of this book was published in 1996.
In 1996 Livia Bardin, M.S.W. led AFF’s first workshop
for families (these have been held every year since in conjunction with
AFF’s annual meeting).
She
developed a collection of forms to better equip families (and friends) to help
a loved one involved in a cultic group:
Summary
of Changes, Pre-cult Identity Chart, Group Profile, Member’s Present
Situation, Sending Important Messages, Using the Private Language, Listening
and Responding, About the Family, Friends and Family Network, Strategic
Planning Worksheet.
In 2000 she
completed a book based on her workshops and forms,
Coping
with Cult Involvement: A Handbook for Families and Friends.
This
book helps families achieve a level of understanding far deeper than that
provided by other written resources.
Education
AFF initiated a preventive educational program, the
International Cult Education Program (ICEP), in 1987.
ICEP’s goals were to develop educational resources for young
people, educators, and clergy, to encourage educational programs for youth,
and to provide support and guidance to those conducting such programs.
Founded and directed by Marcia Rudin until her retirement in 1997, ICEP
produced two videotapes, Cults: Saying
“No” Under Pressure and After
the Cult: Recovering Together, a book, Cultism
on Campus: Commentaries and Guidelines for College and University
Administrators (revised in 1996 under the title, Cults
on Campus: Continuing Challenge), a lesson plan, a collection of
pseudoscience fact sheets, four educational flyers, and the semi-annual
newsletter, Young People and Cults.
Funding cuts prevent AFF from maintaining ICEP as a distinct program
today, although its functions continue to the extent resources permit.
That many people held AFF’s educational activities in
high esteem became evident in June 1995, when AFF president, Herbert Rosedale
(who has served as president since 1987), was asked to deliver a commencement
address to the graduating class of the State University of New York’s
Institute of Technology at Utica/Rome, “Promises and Illusions.”
This address is printed in Cultic
Studies Journal, 11(2).
In 1987 AFF organized a
special conference on Business and the New Age Movement at the American
Management Association in New York City.
This conference brought together journalists, researchers, and helping
professionals to address the legal, ethical, and mental health controversies
that surrounded certain training programs in business.
As a follow-up to this conference Drs. Arthur Dole, Michael Langone,
and Steve Dubrow-Eichel conducted a series of studies designed to clarify what
is meant by “new age.”
Reports
on these studies were published in Cultic
Studies Journal.
AFF’s
contributions to the examination of cultism’s implications for business were
recognized when AFF’s president, Herbert Rosedale, was appointed in 1992
Executive in Residence at the School of Business, Indiana University.
Mr. Rosedale also gave a talk on new age training programs and business
to the annual meeting of the Association of Private Enterprise Education in
Las Vegas, Nevada in 1996.
In the late 1980s AFF witnessed a spate of Satanism
inquiries arising from what in hindsight was a media craze.
In order to provide guidance to young people and educators, AFF’s Dr.
Michael Langone and Linda Blood began work on a paper. This manuscript,
however, soon grew into a book, which AFF published in 1990.
The book’s goal was to give some professional balance to the subject.
The authors reviewed the relevant professional literature, provided
some historical background, and offered concrete advice for families and
mental health professionals.
The
book also addressed the credibility issue with regard to adult survivors of
ritualistic abuse -- what was to grow into the false memory controversy.
Throughout its history AFF staff and advisors have given
talks at universities and professional associations in order to educate
academicians, students, and helping professionals.
They have also consulted with journalists on hundreds, if not
thousands, of occasions.
Appendix
C provides a list of some of the more noteworthy educational programs and
media outlets to which AFF has contributed.
Project Recovery
In 1990 AFF turned its research focus from families to
former group members, for it had become clear that the majority of former
members approaching AFF for help had left their groups on their own without
any parental intervention.
Many
of these individuals were seriously distressed and needed guidance and
support.
In response to this need
AFF initiated a series of study groups, composed of AFF’s volunteer
professionals (i.e., members of its advisory board, which numbered about 120
by 1990) under the rubric “Project Recovery.”
The following are merely the more noteworthy achievements
that resulted from the work of these study groups:
-
Dr. Edward Lottick’s survey of 1396 primary care physicians in
Pennsylvania, conducted under the auspices of the Pennsylvania Medical
Society.
Among other findings,
this
study reported that 2.2% of
subjects said that either they or an immediate family member had been involved
in a cultic group.
Pennsylvania Medicine (February, 1993) published the results of Dr.
Edward Lottick’s survey.
This
study, combined with other research data, suggests that approximately one
percent, or about two to three million Americans have had cultic involvements.
Since other research suggests that people stay in their groups an
average of about six years, we estimate that several thousand individuals
enter and leave cultic groups each year.
-
In 1992 AFF conducted its first weekend workshop for former
group members at the Stony Point Retreat Center, Stony Point, New York.
At least one weekend workshop has been held every year since, and
one-day ex-member workshops are typically held prior to AFF’s annual
conference.
See Appendix D for a
description of AFF workshops.
-
In 1990 Dr. Langone surveyed 308 former group members from 101
different groups.
The Group
Psychological Abuse Scale (GPA), the first measure of “cultishness,” was
derived from these subjects’ responses to a segment of the questionnaire.
CSJ published a report on the development of the GPA in 1994.
A series of studies in the U.S., England, and most recently Spain have
used or are using the GPA as a measure.
-
Dr. Langone and Dr. William Chambers conducted another survey of
108 ex-members in order to evaluate how they related to different terms and
discovered that ex-members prefer terms such as “psychological abuse” or
“spiritual abuse” to “cult,” “brainwashing,” or “mind
control.”
-
Dr. Paul Martin and his colleagues at the Wellspring Retreat and
Resource Center (a residential treatment center for former group members)
analyzed data Wellspring had collected on 124 clients.
CSJ published a report on this research in 1992.
-
In 1992 in Arlington, Virginia AFF conducted a conference,
“Cult Victims and Their Families: Therapeutic Issues.”
In 1995 AFF conducted a joint conference with Denver Seminary:
“Recovery from Cults: A Pastoral/Psychological Dialogue.”
And in 1996, AFF, in conjunction with Iona College’s pastoral and
family counseling department, conducted a conference, “Recovery from Cults
and Other Abusive Groups:
Psychological
and Spiritual Dimensions.”
-
Under Project Recovery, AFF published
AFF
News, a free outreach newsletter directed toward ex-members.
This periodicals function is now fulfilled through AFF’s Web sites
and its free Internet newsletter, AFF
News Briefs.
-
In 1993 Norton Professional Books published AFF’s
Recovery
from Cults, edited by Dr. Michael Langone, a book that the Behavioral
Science Book Service chose as an alternate selection.
This edited book consisted of chapters written by members of the
Project Recovery study groups.
-
In 1993 AFF published Wendy Ford’s book,
Recovery
from Abusive Groups, which provides practical guidelines for individuals
struggling with post-group adjustment issues.
-
In 1994 Hunter House published
Captive Hearts, Captive Minds, written by AFF advisors Madeleine
Tobias and Janja Lalich.
Research Advances
Project Recovery’s research component led to an
important three-day research planning meeting, which was organized by Dr.
Langone and hosted by Dr. Martin and his staff at Wellspring in 1994.
A follow-up meeting was held a year later.
The action recommendations identified at these meetings continue to
guide AFF’s research program.
Appendix
E contains an abridged version of these research meeting reports.
Among those attending these meetings were two teams of
graduate students from Pepperdine University and Ohio University, working
under Dr. David Foy and Dr. Steve Lynn, respectively.
These students later completed several dissertations and
independent research studies (some published in Cultic Studies Journal) relevant to goals of the research plan
enunciated at these meetings.
Some
of this research was reported in a paper presented to the American
Psychological Association’s Division 36, Psychology of Religion in 1996.
Other research was reported on at other professional meetings.
In 1995 Boston University named AFF’s Dr. Langone the
1995 Albert Danielsen Visiting Scholar.
In
this capacity, he conducted a research study that compared former
members/graduates of a cultic group and two mainstream religious groups on (a)
members’ perceptions of group abusiveness, and (b) psychological distress.
This study’s design was a direct result of the research planning
meetings conducted at Wellspring.
In 1994 AFF, with the Cult
Awareness Network and the Cult Hot Line and Clinic of the New York Jewish
Board of Family & Children’s Services, funded and received a special
report from the American Bar Association’s Commission on Mental and Physical
Disability Law:
“Cults in
American Society:
A Legal
Analysis of Undue Influence, Fraud and Misrepresentation.”
This report, published in Cultic
Studies Journal in 1995, reflected AFF’s desire to support legal
research with practical implications for former group members.
In 1996 AFF published The
Boston Movement: Critical Perspectives on the International Churches of Christ
(second edition published in 1998).
Edited
by AFF’s Carol Giambalvo and Herbert Rosedale, this book provided historical
background, personal accounts and analytical chapters on the group about which
AFF had received more inquiries than any other during the 1990s.
Resource Guide
As the number of resources -- books, articles, pamphlets,
videos, lesson plans -- available through AFF grew, it became necessary to
describe all of these resources in one document.
Thus, in 1998 AFF published Cults
and Psychological Abuse: A Resource Guide (revised in 1999).
This 119-page book provided brief suggestions for general inquirers,
families, ex-members, current members, mental health professional, legal
professionals, educators, students, clergy, and occult-ritual abuse inquirers.
It also included 18 essays and checklists on topics ranging from “On
Using the Term `Cult’” to “How Can Young People Protect Themselves
Against Cults.”
The book also
devoted 36 pages to describing AFF’s books, reports, information packets,
videos, preventive education resources, CSJ reprint collections, and
individual CSJ article reprints.
This
resource guide demonstrates how far AFF has come since its founding, when
there were virtually no resources for people concerned about cult
involvements.
Conferences
AFF has organized conferences since its founding.
In recent years AFF’s conferences have become increasingly
international in scope and larger with respect to the number of programs
available to attendees.
Until
1998 all AFF conferences took place in the Northeast between Washington D.C.
and Boston, which is where the bulk of AFF’s supporters live.
But in 1998 AFF decided to move out of that geographical base by
organizing a conference in Chicago.
In
1999 the annual conference took place in Minnesota; in 2000 in Seattle.
Then in 2001 the conference returned to the Northeast, to Newark, New
Jersey.
In 2002 the annual
conference will head south for the first time and will take place in Orlando,
Florida from June 13-15th.
The 2001 conference had approximately 270 attendees and
nearly 70 speakers.
Attendees
came from two dozen countries, including China, South Africa, Russia, and
Brazil.
Approximately 40
attendees came from foreign countries.
A
three-track organization was employed so that during most periods attendees
could choose from research, victim assistance, and international/legal
programs.
As with other annual conferences during the 1990s, this
year’s conference included two preconference workshops, one for families and
one for ex-members.
Next year’s
conference, which will also have three tracks and family and ex-member
workshops, will also include a preconference workshop for mental health
professionals.
The Web:
AFF’s Future
AFF’s Web site was first posted on the Internet in
1995.
Begun initially through the
volunteer efforts of Patrick Ryan, AFF’s Web site,
www.csj.org,
grew considerably over the years.
It
now has over 1000 pages of material.
It
won a number of awards, including:
-
A three-star rating by Mental Health Net, the largest catalog of
mental health, psychology, and psychiatry resources online.
-
A review The Web Crawler, one of the main Internet indexes,
which reviews very few web pages.
-
Inclusion in the Britannica
Internet Guide (http://www.ebig.com).
The Internet has markedly changed how AFF functions.
Until the late 1990s AFF traditionally depended upon journalists to get
our message out.
Most people who contacted us found out about us either
through word of mouth or from a newspaper article.
Today, because so many people, including nearly all journalists, are on
the Web, more than 90% of the people who directly contact us -- usually by
e-mail -- for the first time found us on the Web.
Inquirers come from all over the world.
Indeed, inspection of our Web site’s statistics reveals
that during a typical week the site will be visited by more than 10,000 people
from about 70 countries.
Through the Internet more people can take advantage of
AFF’s resources in a couple of months than during the prior 20 years.
For this reason AFF decided several years ago to
transform the organization so as to make it Internet-based.
This has been a daunting and unpredictably time-consuming
endeavor, for the transformation must occur while we continue to do all the
work we have traditionally done – without any increase in manpower.
We have made a great deal of progress.
For example, all Cultic Studies Journal
articles and book reviews are now available in electronic format.
With a few clicks of a mouse and within a few seconds we can send five
CSJ reprints to an inquirer in Ceylon.
We
are gradually converting past issues of Cult
Observer to electronic format.
When
this project is completed, we will be able to e-mail about 4000 articles on
more than 1000 different groups as easily as we can now send CSJ articles.
We
are also looking into methods of making such material available on the Web.
In addition, we have collected and filed in our electronic folders more
than 13,000 newspaper articles on more than 2000 groups.
Our goal is to put together an electronic library that will have these
resources as well as selected books, articles from journals other than our
own, and even videos.
How rapidly
we progress toward the completion of this goal will depend upon how generously
our supporters continue to donate.
We are also developing new Web
sites.
In 2000 a special grant
enabled us to launch a project that seeks to use the Internet to provide
spiritual and religious seekers, youth in particular, with resources reviewed
and recommended by an ecumenical advisory board of experts.
AFF's partner in this project is the Center for Youth Studies in
Hamilton, Massachusetts, directed by Rev. Dean Borgman, the Charles E.
Culpepper Professor of Youth Ministries at Gordon-Conwell Theological
Seminary.
This project resulted
from our observation that cultic and other dubious groups often project a more
sophisticated Web presence than mainstream religions.
Such observations are especially troubling given that research
indicates that 4% of the more than 8,000,000 teens who use the Internet do so
for religious reasons and 16% of teens say the Internet will substitute for
their current church experiences within the next five years (see “Teenage
Spirituality and the Internet” in this issue).
We believe that it is
important to develop and effectively market a Web site that will direct
seekers to credible information sources that will not exploit or mislead them.
This project revolves around a Web site, faithresource.org, which
contains, or will contain, the following sections, in addition to information
on the sponsoring organizations and the project's advisory board:
-
Religion Showcase - Provides lists of Web sites, books,
articles, periodicals, organizations, and other resources on the world's major
faith traditions and the major branches of Christianity.
-
Spiritual Abuse - Directs visitors to AFF's Web site and other
resources focusing on the ways in which spiritual seekers can be exploited,
manipulated, and abused.
-
Religion News - Directs visitors to credible Web and print
resources specializing in religious news.
-
Newsletter - Provides visitors with a free newsletter that
informs them about changes to the site, events of note, and, ultimately,
conferences and workshops that faithresource.org might conduct.
-
Interactive Web forums for youth - If this project continues to
be funded, faithresource.org will, to the extent resources permit, answer,
through e-mail, young persons' questions about religion, spirituality, and
spiritual seeking.
Over time a
Question-and-Answer Index will be developed and kept on the Web site for the
benefit of all visitors (inquirers' identities will, of course, remain
anonymous).
Project staff will
answer questions, but, in a form of peer review, the staff's answers will not
be posted until they have been reviewed and approved by at least two expert
advisors.
Other interactive
forums will also be explored.
Currently, this project is more or less on hold, for the
seed grant expired in the summer of 2001.
We hope, however, to refund it in 2002 and continue its development.
In 2002 AFF merged Cultic
Studies Journal and Cult Observer
into the journal in which this article is published, Cultic Studies Review: An Internet Journal of News, Research, and
Opinion (CSR).
Although
designed as an Internet journal, CSR has a print version for those supporters
not yet online, libraries, and those supporters who believe that cyberspace
can never substitute for the heft of paper in the hand.
We decided to merge the two periodicals in order to make more efficient
use of manpower and to take advantage of the Internet’s immunity to printing
and postage costs.
CSR is
supplemented by AFF’s free electronic newsletter, AFF
News Briefs, which also includes a print version.
The newsletter provides limited group news, announcements of
upcoming events, brief essays, and news on the activities of researchers and
cult educators around the world.
CSR is supplemented by AFF’s latest Website, www.CulticStudies.org.
This site complements (and may eventually supplant) www.csj.org.
CulticStudies.org has rebuilt and greatly expanded the quantity and
quality of free information that has been available on www.csj.org.
It also links to a special AFF bookstore Website, which is
database driven and much more effective than what was formerly on www.csj.org.
Thoughts on the Future
Although AFF has grown remarkably since its founding, two
vital elements of the organization have remained constant:
-
A focus on professionalism and research aimed at helping those harmed
by cultic involvements and forewarning those who might be harmed in the
future.
-
Continuity of leadership, management efficiency, and financial
discipline.
AFF’s enduring focus on professionalism, its
administrative efficiency and effectiveness, and the hard work and dedication
of its volunteer professionals have resulted in the following general
achievements:
-
A remarkable increase in the quantity and quality of information
available to families, former group members, helping professionals, and
others.
-
A more nuanced articulation of the cult phenomenon.
This journal’s name and the new Website’s name, “CulticStudies.org,”
for example, emphasize that we do not see the issue that concerns us in
black-and-white terms, “cult” and “not cult.”
We see a wide range of groups that change over time and reveal a
spectrum of “cultishness.”
-
Much higher levels of understanding within professional communities,
especially mental health and education.
-
Increased communication internationally and between the so-called
“camps” of cultic studies.
AFF’s day-to-day work over the next several years is
likely to revolve around the following programs:
-
Publication of
Cultic Studies
Review, AFF News Briefs, and
books.
-
Providing information to Website visitors and e-mail, phone, and snail
mail inquirers.
-
Updating existing Websites and developing a comprehensive electronic
library.
-
Conducting and/or supporting scientific research studies, as financial
resources permit.
-
Organizing an annual conference and workshops for families, ex-members,
and mental health professionals.
-
Working with and supporting volunteer professionals who will continue
to contribute to professional publications and to lecture on this subject.
Although AFF’s mission has remained constant, the
methods it employs to fulfill that mission have changed with the times.
Most of our “space,” for example, now consists of dancing
electrons; we use considerably fewer “square feet” of physical space to
operate than was the case in 1981.
Although raising enough money to do what needs to be done
is as difficult as ever, the nature of our support has changed over the years.
We are still dependent upon several large contributions.
However, we are not nearly so dependent as we were 15 years ago.
Small donations, subscriptions, and purchases now constitute more than
60% of our income, compared to about 20% in the early 1980s.
The people who contribute to AFF have also changed,
although many stalwarts – volunteers and financial supporters -- have stayed
with us from the beginning.
In
1979 most of the energy behind AFF came from parents of the cult-affected.
Today, most of that energy comes from former group members, especially
those who have gone on to get advanced degrees after recovering from their
group experience.
These former
group members will develop the new and refined conceptual models and will
conduct the research studies that will carry the cultic studies field to a
higher level of understanding.
AFF began as one man’s vision to apply scientific
methods to the problems of people hurt by groups that deceive, manipulate, and
exploit in the name “love.”
This
has been and will continue to be a difficult task, for the problems that
motivate us to action are not easy to define with precision and are difficult
to study scientifically.
But
AFF’s history demonstrates that this task is not impossible, however
difficult.
Much has been learned;
many people have been helped.
Nevertheless,
much work remains, and many more people will need help.
Appendices
Appendix A:
AFF Information
Service
People who seek information or assistance from AFF are
typically concerned about groups that appear to be disturbingly manipulative
and/or exploitative.
Many people
use the term, "cult," to describe such groups.
Other terms include "new religious movement,"
"charismatic group," "high intensity group," and
"sect."
In order to
communicate effectively and respond to inquirers' needs AFF uses the term,
"cult," which appears to be the preferred term among those concerned
about a group.
However, we
emphasize to inquirers that this term has limited utility.
We recommend that all inquirers read the essay, "On
Using the Term `Cult.’"
We also recommend that inquirers read other essays and suggestion
sheets available on this site, including information on resources for various
categories of inquirers:
families/relatives,
former group members, current group members, mental health or medical
professionals, legal or law-enforcement professionals, educators, students,
and clergy.
Most inquirers want information on a specific group that
troubles them.
Often, we can
provide information (our files include at least one article on more than 3000
groups).
But in other cases we
know of no information on a specific group or have very little information.
Sometimes we can find information through diligent searches of written
and electronic resources and AFF's network of volunteer professionals. Even
when we have or can find information on a group, however, this information by
itself does not usually help inquirers determine what to do about their
concerns.
That is why AFF has
developed resources that help inquirers understand how groups can manipulate,
exploit, and harm individuals and what to do to address this harm.
Groups may vary greatly in their beliefs and practices
(e.g., eastern mystical, Bible-based, psychotherapy, political, New Age,
commercial).
Those that cause
concern, however (and it is important to keep in mind that many nontraditional
groups do not arouse concern), tend to influence their members through
subtle psychological processes that are strikingly similar from group to
group.
In order to understand a
person's group involvement well enough to help that person, whether that
person be a family member, friend, client, or oneself, it is vital to
understand these processes of psychological influence.
Superf