Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects. Information on cults, cultic groups, psychological manipulation, psychological abuse, spiritual abuse, brainwashing, mind control, thought reform, abusive churches, extremism, totalistic groups, new religious movements, alternative and mainstream religions, group dynamics, exit counseling, recovery, and practical suggestions for those affected by or interested in these subjects
articles about cults

HOMENewsMembershipConferencesWorkshopse-Library Infoe-Library Logone-Library Search

New SurveyEx-Member/others

GroupsStudy GuidesTopicsLinksPeopleOrganizationsArticlesBook Reviews

Info for:Former MembersFamiliesMental HealthResearchEducationClergyPress

CSR Journale-NewsletterBookstoreProducts

About ICSADonateContact UsHelpSearch

Site Feedback

 

 
 

Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2004

 

The "Helpmate" of Males: An Ethnography on Sex Segregation and Theocracy

 

Cliff Cheng, Ph.D.
University of Southern California (USC)


Abstract


This ethnography explores sex segregation in a cultic communal social change movement - "The Third Sacred School." "The Third Sacred School" had 12 "units" (communes) in western Caucasian Christian countries. First a study of "The Third Sacred School's" organizational structure was done. The member's view in "The Third Sacred School" is that is has no structure and no hierarchy. Focus groups comprised of 36 members indicated that there was a hierarchical organizational structure. Within individual "units" there were five hierarchical levels. Above the "units" was "Spiritual Leader." "Spiritual Leader's" job has always been held by a male, for "The Third Sacred School" believes "women focus spirit through men." After the structural study was done, members were coded into the structure based on their job assignments. In the "units," the top two organizational levels included 6 "Unit Focuses" and their assistants and the "Unit Managers." Only males held these jobs. At the third level, the "Unit Managers" were assisted by 12 (6 males, 6 females) "Work Pattern Coordinators," who oversaw a workforce that was sex segregated into the "Men's Work Pattern" and the "Women's Work Pattern." The fourth level of hierarchy consisted of departments which were either the women's work pattern, i.e., kitchen, household, or men's work pattern, i.e., construction/maintenance, farm/ranch. Of the 10 Department Supervisors at the fourth level of hierarchy, 6 were males, and 4 were females. At the worker level, there were 402 workers, 287 females and 115 males, a 2.5:1 ratio of females to males. Most females started at and stayed at the fifth and lowest level of hierarchy. The females at levels two through four were usually wives of high-ranking males. The subject organization used theocracy to justify patriarchal sex segregation.
 

Full text available through ICSA E-Library.


Other contributions by author(s)

Cheng, Cliff, Ph.D.: "The 'Helpmate" of Males: An Ethnography on Sex Segregation and Theocracy" - abstract
Conference 2003 CA: Agenda

Article Index
 

 top ^

Live Search

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors.  Copyright ©1997-2008  ICSA, Inc.